Hi Guenter, > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 08:22:11AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:05:07PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On 10/22/2013 11:57 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > >On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 05:35:41PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > >>* PGP Signed by an unknown key > > > >> > > > >>Hi Wim, > > > >> > > > >>This is v2 of my pull request. Please ignore the previous request. > > > >>There are a couple of changes as outlined below, and I rebased the > > > >>branch to 3.12-rc6. > > > >> > > > >>Please consider pulling watchdog updates for Linux 3.13 from signed tag: > > > >> > > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git watchdog-for-wim > > > >> > > > >>The tag has been applied on top of the watchdog-next branch. The branch includes > > > >>a number of patches I collected over the last few months. It does not include > > > >>all submitted patches; only the ones I reviewed and felt comfortable with are > > > >>included. > > > >> > > > >>I reviewed all patches and ran build tests as well as source verification tests > > > >>with both smatch and spatch. The branch has been on my Linux repo for a while, > > > >>so presumably Fenguang's robot will have built the code as well. > > > >>The w83627hf patches have been running on several servers for more than a month > > > >>without problems. > > > >> > > > >>You can find the most recent build results at > > > >>http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders/watchdog-next. > > > >> > > > >>If you don't want to apply the entire series, please consider applying whatever > > > >>subset you might feel comfortable with. > > > >> > > > >>Thanks, > > > >>Guenter > > > >> > > > >>------ > > > > > > > >Hi Gunther, > > > > > > > >Can you please drop the patch from me from the pull request? I'm afraid > > > >something went wrong there, I thought Stephen Warren and I decided to just move > > > >the binding document and not change the bindings, as the driver went upstream in > > > >3.11. > > > > > > > > > > Your original patch is at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/21/251. > > > Do you want that version applied, with Stephen's Ack ? > > > > > > > If you could do that, that would be great. If not I'll resend it. > > > Ok, I applied it to the watchdog-next branch of my repository on > kernel.org (on top of v2 and its revert). > > Wim, please let me know how you want to handle it from there. You can pick > it up from there (or direcetly from lkml), I could send you yet another pull > request of the current branch, or I could rebase the branch again, drop v2 > of the patch and its revert, and send you a pull request of the result. > Or do nothing, of course. I added the old patch to linux-watchdog-next. So you don't need to do anything anymore. Kind regards, Wim. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
