Re: [PATCH v7] watchdog: Add MOXA ART watchdog driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/02/2013 04:41 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 01:33:48PM +0100, Jonas Jensen wrote:
Add watchdog driver for MOXA ART SoCs.

[ ... ]
+
+	err = watchdog_register_device(&moxart_wdt->dev);
+	if (unlikely(err))
+		return err;

This is a probe path. Is the use of unlikely() really appropriate here?
I suspect it doesn't make any appreciable difference, and should go.

Just wondering, for my education - why ? Is there s rule that unlikely()
shall not be used in the probe path ? If so, I would like to know it and
its reasoning to be able to apply it to my own reviews.

Thanks,
Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux