On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:55:33PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[...]
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxx>
>
> Almost good. One comment below.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
Nice to hear. Thanks for the review by the way.
[...]
> > +
> > + drv->num_gpios = of_gpio_count(node);
> > + if (drv->num_gpios <= 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "gpios DT property empty / missing");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
>
> Not happy with this. Code accepts one gpio pin, but then assumes throughout the
> driver that all pins are defined. I am quite sure I can get it to crash if I
> specify only a single gpio pin. num_gpios will be 1, you allocate a single
> entry, but then access all 6 of them.
>
> I think it would be easier if you expect a fixed number of gpio pins (6) and abort
> if it is not correct. You can then make drv->gpios an array and don't have to
> allocate it separately, and you don't need drv->num_gpios (which you don't need
> anyway as it is not used outside this function).
>
Yup, you're right. Now that you're saying it I see it as well. This is probably a
copy'n'paste error from drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c.
@Wim are there any objections from your side?
Byte
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
