01.02.2013 19:59, Don Zickus пишет:
> Hmm, that seems to make sense. I was expecting that problem to pop up on
> my end but didn't see. I just asusmed the boot code didn't use that
> decompressor.
Can you accumulate all our discussion and create one right-coded,
kernelcode-styled patch?
> Though I am not sure why that is leading to your other PATA problems
> below. Did you have similar problems when you used other decompression
> levels?
In past - no. But I not test this last kernel variant with other level.
> I am not sure how to explain the differences.
I think this is similar as decompress:
Kernel stop and wait next try in "default_idle()" for 20-30 sec, and in
this moment softlockup detector panics ;)
But without patch for touch_softlockup_watchdog in
decompress_unlzma+misc.c it works (try, fail, pause, try, fail, go on).
--
Mike
Sapienti sat.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
