On 01/28/2013 10:35 PM, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi Hauke, > >> what is the status of these patches? > > First reading/checking (v4+v5) seems OK. > 1 small remark allready: the settimeout functions seem to check the min and max timeout values. > Can't you use the min and max values of the watchdog structure for this? > > Kind regards, > Wim. > Hi Wim, The max_timer_ms attribute in struct bcm47xx_wdt contains the maximum value the hardware is capable of, the watchdog driver uses a softtimer if this value is too low and in that case it is no problem if a userspace application sets the timeout to some value higher than max_timer_ms. If I would use max_timeout from struct watchdog_device I would have to change that values when softtimer is selected. The best solution would be if the softtimer choice and implementation would go to watchdog_dev.c as some more watchdog driver do something similar. Hauke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
