On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Linus, > >> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> case WDIOC_GETTIMELEFT: >> >> clk_enable(clk); >> >> /* Read repeatedly until the value is stable! */ >> > >> > I was wondering if it pays to put this IOCTL to watchdog_dev and add another >> > callback to watchdog_ops? I'd think so. Wim, Linus, what do you think? >> >> OK with me, shall I hack a patch? > > I think Viresh did something allready. OK I rebased on top of Viresh's patch and sent them both out since I don't know the status of his patch. If you already have Viresh's patch in your tree just applying 2/2 should work as fine. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
