> > bootcount itself is not a device. It is a feature of certain devices. And that > > needs to be implemented; possibly generic enough that it can work for register > > based, i2c based, and so forth, accesses. > > If "boot counter" is not a good name for such a device, then what name > would you suggest? None. > Or do you think a counter (which can be implemented in a number of > different ways, depending on hardware specifics) is not a device? Yes. > What would be such a device, then? "maxim,ds1338" Please have a look at the devicetree.org-wiki-page I just mentioned: http://devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
