On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:58:14 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 18 June 2011 19:19:46 Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > > watchdog: WatchDog Timer Driver Core - Part 1 > > > > The WatchDog Timer Driver Core is a framework > > that contains the common code for all watchdog-driver's. > > It also introduces a watchdog device structure and the > > operations that go with it. > > > > This is the introduction of this framework. This part > > supports the minimal watchdog userspace API (or with > > other words: the functionality to use /dev/watchdog's > > open, release and write functionality as defined in > > the simplest watchdog API). Extra functionality will > > follow in the next set of patches. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Wim, > > Great to see the series posted again, I'm looking forward to seeing > this included in 3.1. > > I've got a few comments for stuff that can still be improved. > > I noticed that your email subject lines are all the same, you should > probably see if you mail setup can be fixed to take the one-line > comment in each patch as the subject, and also to make all mails > replies to the [PATCH 0/10] email. It would also be good to include diffstat summaries with each patch. This info in Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt does not change, correct? 'W' 00-1F linux/watchdog.h conflict! --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
