On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 03:27:42PM -0500, Joe Damato wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:08:49PM -0500, Joe Damato wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:03:09PM -0500, Joe Damato wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:48:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:05 AM Joe Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Use netif_queue_set_napi to map NAPIs to queue IDs so that the mapping > > > > > can be accessed by user apps, taking care to hold RTNL as needed. > > > > > > > > I may miss something but I wonder whether letting the caller hold the > > > > lock is better. > > > > > > Hmm... > > > > > > Double checking all the paths over again, here's what I see: > > > - refill_work, delayed work that needs RTNL so this change seems > > > right? > > > > > > - virtnet_disable_queue_pair, called from virtnet_open and > > > virtnet_close. When called via NDO these are safe and hold RTNL, > > > but they can be called from power management and need RTNL. > > > > > > - virtnet_enable_queue_pair called from virtnet_open, safe when > > > used via NDO but needs RTNL when used via power management. > > > > > > - virtnet_rx_pause called in both paths as you mentioned, one > > > which needs RTNL and one which doesn't. > > > > Sorry, I missed more paths: > > > > - virtnet_rx_resume > > - virtnet_tx_pause and virtnet_tx_resume > > > > which are similar to path you mentioned (virtnet_rx_pause) and need > > rtnl in one of two different paths. > > > > Let me know if I missed any paths and what your preferred way to fix > > this would be? > > > > I think both options below are possible and I have no strong > > preference. > > OK, my apologies. I read your message and the code wrong. Sorry for > the back-to-back emails from me. > > Please ignore my message above... I think after re-reading the code, > here's where I've arrived: > > - refill_work needs to hold RTNL (as in the existing patch) > > - virtnet_rx_pause, virtnet_rx_resume, virtnet_tx_pause, > virtnet_tx_resume -- all do NOT need to hold RTNL because it is > already held in the ethtool resize path and the XSK path, as you > explained, but I mis-read (sorry). > > - virtnet_disable_queue_pair and virtnet_enable_queue_pair both > need to hold RTNL only when called via power management, but not > when called via ndo_open or ndo_close > > Is my understanding correct and does it match your understanding? > > If so, that means there are two issues: > > 1. Fixing the hardcoded bools in rx_pause, rx_resume, tx_pause, > tx_resume (all should be false, RTNL is not needed). > > 2. Handling the power management case which calls virtnet_open and > virtnet_close. > > I made a small diff included below as an example of a possible > solution: > > 1. Modify virtnet_disable_queue_pair and virtnet_enable_queue_pair > to take a "bool need_rtnl" and pass it through to the helpers > they call. > > 2. Create two helpers, virtnet_do_open and virt_do_close both of > which take struct net_device *dev, bool need_rtnl. virtnet_open > and virtnet_close are modified to call the helpers and pass > false for need_rtnl. The power management paths call the > helpers and pass true for need_rtnl. (fixes issue 2 above) > > 3. Fix the bools for rx_pause, rx_resume, tx_pause, tx_resume to > pass false since all paths that I could find that lead to these > functions hold RTNL. (fixes issue 1 above) > > See the diff below (which can be applied on top of patch 3) to see > what it looks like. > > If you are OK with this approach, I will send a v5 where patch 3 > includes the changes shown in this diff. > > Please let me know what you think: Looks ok I think. > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > index 13bb4a563073..76ecb8f3ce9a 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > @@ -3098,14 +3098,16 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) > return received; > } > > -static void virtnet_disable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index) > +static void virtnet_disable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index, > + bool need_rtnl) > { > - virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[qp_index], false); > - virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[qp_index], false); > + virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[qp_index], need_rtnl); > + virtnet_napi_disable(&vi->rq[qp_index], need_rtnl); > xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&vi->rq[qp_index].xdp_rxq); > } > > -static int virtnet_enable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index) > +static int virtnet_enable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index, > + bool need_rtnl) > { > struct net_device *dev = vi->dev; > int err; > @@ -3120,8 +3122,8 @@ static int virtnet_enable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index) > if (err < 0) > goto err_xdp_reg_mem_model; > > - virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[qp_index], false); > - virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[qp_index], false); > + virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[qp_index], need_rtnl); > + virtnet_napi_tx_enable(&vi->sq[qp_index], need_rtnl); > > return 0; > > @@ -3156,7 +3158,7 @@ static void virtnet_update_settings(struct virtnet_info *vi) > vi->duplex = duplex; > } > > -static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev) > +static int virtnet_do_open(struct net_device *dev, bool need_rtnl) > { > struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); > int i, err; > @@ -3169,7 +3171,7 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev) > if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL)) > schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0); > > - err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i); > + err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i, need_rtnl); > if (err < 0) > goto err_enable_qp; > } > @@ -3190,13 +3192,18 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev) > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill); > > for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { > - virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i); > + virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i, need_rtnl); > virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &vi->rq[i].dim); > } > > return err; > } > > +static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev) > +{ > + return virtnet_do_open(dev, false); > +} > + > static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) > { > struct send_queue *sq = container_of(napi, struct send_queue, napi); > @@ -3373,7 +3380,7 @@ static void virtnet_rx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq) > bool running = netif_running(vi->dev); > > if (running) { > - virtnet_napi_disable(rq, true); > + virtnet_napi_disable(rq, false); > virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &rq->dim); > } > } > @@ -3386,7 +3393,7 @@ static void virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq) > schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0); > > if (running) > - virtnet_napi_enable(rq, true); > + virtnet_napi_enable(rq, false); > } > > static int virtnet_rx_resize(struct virtnet_info *vi, > @@ -3415,7 +3422,7 @@ static void virtnet_tx_pause(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct send_queue *sq) > qindex = sq - vi->sq; > > if (running) > - virtnet_napi_tx_disable(sq, true); > + virtnet_napi_tx_disable(sq, false); > > txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qindex); > > @@ -3449,7 +3456,7 @@ static void virtnet_tx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct send_queue *sq) > __netif_tx_unlock_bh(txq); > > if (running) > - virtnet_napi_tx_enable(sq, true); > + virtnet_napi_tx_enable(sq, false); > } > > static int virtnet_tx_resize(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct send_queue *sq, > @@ -3708,7 +3715,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs) > return 0; > } > > -static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev) > +static int virtnet_do_close(struct net_device *dev, bool need_rtnl) > { > struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); > int i; > @@ -3727,7 +3734,7 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev) > cancel_work_sync(&vi->config_work); > > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { > - virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i); > + virtnet_disable_queue_pair(vi, i, need_rtnl); > virtnet_cancel_dim(vi, &vi->rq[i].dim); > } > > @@ -3736,6 +3743,11 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev) > return 0; > } > > +static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev) > +{ > + return virtnet_do_close(dev, false); > +} > + > static void virtnet_rx_mode_work(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct virtnet_info *vi = > @@ -5682,7 +5694,7 @@ static void virtnet_freeze_down(struct virtio_device *vdev) > netif_device_detach(vi->dev); > netif_tx_unlock_bh(vi->dev); > if (netif_running(vi->dev)) > - virtnet_close(vi->dev); > + virtnet_do_close(vi->dev, true); > } > > static int init_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi); > @@ -5702,7 +5714,7 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev) > enable_rx_mode_work(vi); > > if (netif_running(vi->dev)) { > - err = virtnet_open(vi->dev); > + err = virtnet_do_open(vi->dev, false); > if (err) > return err; > }