On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 15:47, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I forgot to mention that IMHO it's better to split this series. >This first patch (this one) seems ready, without controversy, and it's >a real fix, so for me v3 should be a version ready to be merged. > >While the other patch is more controversial and especially not a fix >but more of a new feature, so I don't think it makes sense to continue >to have these two patches in a single series. > >Thanks, >Stefano Well, I agree with you that these two patches should be splited. And I will send v3 version of the first patch individually. And according to our discussion, the second one can be ignored, until we find a suitable way to deal the scenario I metionded. Thanks, Junnan
