On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:41:38 +0000, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:36:31AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > For the crash at hand, which clearly shows nVHE, can you report > > whether the following hack fixes it for you? > > > > M. > > No luck, I'm afraid. It still crashes the same way. Right. It was one level deeper. The following change fixes it for me. YMMV. M. diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h index f838a45665f26..b899d815d272f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h @@ -501,9 +501,22 @@ static inline bool handle_tx2_tvm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return true; } +/* Open-coded version of timer_get_offset() to allow for kern_hyp_va() */ +static inline u64 hyp_timer_get_offset(struct arch_timer_context *ctxt) +{ + u64 offset = 0; + + if (ctxt->offset.vm_offset) + offset += *kern_hyp_va(ctxt->offset.vm_offset); + if (ctxt->offset.vcpu_offset) + offset += *kern_hyp_va(ctxt->offset.vcpu_offset); + + return offset; +} + static inline u64 compute_counter_value(struct arch_timer_context *ctxt) { - return arch_timer_read_cntpct_el0() - timer_get_offset(ctxt); + return arch_timer_read_cntpct_el0() - hyp_timer_get_offset(ctxt); } static bool kvm_handle_cntxct(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.