On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 09:58:13AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 3:57 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 05:52:58 +0000, Joe Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Use netif_queue_set_napi to map NAPIs to queue IDs so that the mapping
> > > can be accessed by user apps.
> > >
> > > $ ethtool -i ens4 | grep driver
> > > driver: virtio_net
> > >
> > > $ sudo ethtool -L ens4 combined 4
> > >
> > > $ ./tools/net/ynl/pyynl/cli.py \
> > > --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml \
> > > --dump queue-get --json='{"ifindex": 2}'
> > > [{'id': 0, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8289, 'type': 'rx'},
> > > {'id': 1, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8290, 'type': 'rx'},
> > > {'id': 2, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8291, 'type': 'rx'},
> > > {'id': 3, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8292, 'type': 'rx'},
> > > {'id': 0, 'ifindex': 2, 'type': 'tx'},
> > > {'id': 1, 'ifindex': 2, 'type': 'tx'},
> > > {'id': 2, 'ifindex': 2, 'type': 'tx'},
> > > {'id': 3, 'ifindex': 2, 'type': 'tx'}]
> > >
> > > Note that virtio_net has TX-only NAPIs which do not have NAPI IDs, so
> > > the lack of 'napi-id' in the above output is expected.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > - Eliminate RTNL code paths using the API Jakub introduced in patch 1
> > > of this v2.
> > > - Added virtnet_napi_disable to reduce code duplication as
> > > suggested by Jason Wang.
> > >
> > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > index cff18c66b54a..c6fda756dd07 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > @@ -2803,9 +2803,18 @@ static void virtnet_napi_do_enable(struct virtqueue *vq,
> > > local_bh_enable();
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi)
> > > +static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq,
> > > + struct napi_struct *napi)
> > > {
> > > + struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
> > > + int q = vq2rxq(vq);
> > > + u16 curr_qs;
> > > +
> > > virtnet_napi_do_enable(vq, napi);
> > > +
> > > + curr_qs = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs;
> > > + if (!vi->xdp_enabled || q < curr_qs)
> > > + netif_queue_set_napi(vi->dev, q, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, napi);
> >
> > So what case the check of xdp_enabled is for?
>
> +1 and I think the XDP related checks should be done by the caller not here.
Based on the reply further down in the thread, it seems that these
queues should be mapped regardless of whether an XDP program is
attached or not, IIUC.
Feel free to reply there, if you disagree/have comments.
> >
> > And I think we should merge this to last commit.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> Thanks
FWIW, I don't plan to merge the commits, due to the reason mentioned
further down in the thread.
Thanks.
