Re: [PATCH v2 25/25] drm/xlnx: Compute dumb-buffer sizes with drm_mode_size_dumb()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 16/01/2025 12:17, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 11:03 AM Tomi Valkeinen
<tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 16/01/2025 10:09, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Am 15.01.25 um 15:20 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen:
[...]

My point is that we have the current UAPI, and we have userspace using
it, but we don't have clear rules what the ioctl does with specific
parameters, and we don't document how it has to be used.

Perhaps the situation is bad, and all we can really say is that
CREATE_DUMB only works for use with simple RGB formats, and the
behavior for all other formats is platform specific. But I think even
that would be valuable in the UAPI docs.

To be honest, I would not want to specify behavior for anything but the
linear RGB formats. If anything, I'd take Daniel's reply mail for
documentation as-is. Anyone stretching the UAPI beyond RGB is on their own.

Thinking about this, I wonder if this change is good for omapdrm or
xilinx (probably other platforms too that support non-simple non-RGB
formats via dumb buffers): without this patch, in both drivers, the
pitch calculations just take the bpp as bit-per-pixels, align it up,
and that's it.

With this patch we end up using drm_driver_color_mode_format(), and
aligning buffers according to RGB formats figured out via heuristics.
It does happen to work, for the formats I tested, but it sounds like
something that might easily not work, as it's doing adjustments based
on wrong format.

Should we have another version of drm_mode_size_dumb() which just
calculates using the bpp, without the drm_driver_color_mode_format()
path? Or does the drm_driver_color_mode_format() path provide some
value for the drivers that do not currently do anything similar?

With the RGB-only rule, using drm_driver_color_mode_format() makes
sense. It aligns dumb buffers and video=, provides error checking, and
overall harmonizes code. The fallback is only required because of the
existing odd cases that already bend the UAPI's rules.

I have to disagree here.

On the platforms I have been using (omap, tidss, xilinx, rcar) the dumb
buffers are the only buffers you can get from the DRM driver. The dumb
buffers have been used to allocate linear and multiplanar YUV buffers
for a very long time on those platforms.

I tried to look around, but I did not find any mentions that CREATE_DUMB
should only be used for RGB buffers. Is anyone outside the core
developers even aware of it?

If we don't use dumb buffers there, where do we get the buffers? Maybe
from a v4l2 device or from a gpu device, but often you don't have those.
DMA_HEAP is there, of course.

Why can't there be a variant that takes a proper fourcc format instead of
an imprecise bpp value?

There can, but it's somewhat a different topic, although it's been covered a bit in this thread.

My specific concern here is the current CREATE_DUMB, and (not) changing how it behaves.

 Tomi





[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux