Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] vhost: Add the cgroup related function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:41:42AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
Add back the previously removed cgroup function to support the kthread

nit: missing . at the end

The biggest change for this part is in vhost_attach_cgroups() and
vhost_attach_task_to_cgroups().

It's not clear what the big change is, is there a piece missing?


The old function was remove in

s/remove/removed

BTW which is the old function?

commit 6e890c5d5021 ("vhost: use vhost_tasks for worker threads")

Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 1feba29abf95..812dfd218bc2 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/cgroup.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
@@ -620,6 +621,38 @@ long vhost_dev_check_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_dev_check_owner);

+struct vhost_attach_cgroups_struct {
+	struct vhost_work work;
+	struct task_struct *owner;
+	int ret;
+};
+
+static void vhost_attach_cgroups_work(struct vhost_work *work)
+{
+	struct vhost_attach_cgroups_struct *s;
+
+	s = container_of(work, struct vhost_attach_cgroups_struct, work);
+	s->ret = cgroup_attach_task_all(s->owner, current);
+}
+
+static int vhost_attach_task_to_cgroups(struct vhost_worker *worker)

This function looks renamed, should we mention in the commit description?

+{
+	struct vhost_flush_struct flush;
+	struct vhost_attach_cgroups_struct attach;
+
+	attach.owner = current;
+
+	vhost_work_init(&attach.work, vhost_attach_cgroups_work);
+	vhost_worker_queue(worker, &attach.work);
+
+	init_completion(&flush.wait_event);
+	vhost_work_init(&flush.work, vhost_flush_work);
+	vhost_worker_queue(worker, &flush.work);
+	wait_for_completion(&flush.wait_event);

IIUC this block is the old "vhost_dev_flush", right?

Maybe we should mention also that in the commit description.

+
+	return attach.ret;
+}
+
/* Caller should have device mutex */
bool vhost_dev_has_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev)
{
--
2.45.0






[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux