Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] virtio_net: replace vq2rxq with vq2txq where appropriate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 02:07:19PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> While not harmful, using vq2rxq where it's always sq appears odd.
> Replace it with the more appropriate vq2txq for clarity and correctness.
> 
> Fixes: 89f86675cb03 ("virtio_net: xsk: tx: support xmit xsk buffer")
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 48ce8b3881b6..1b7a85e75e14 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -6213,7 +6213,7 @@ static void virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)
>  {
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
>  	struct send_queue *sq;
> -	int i = vq2rxq(vq);
> +	int i = vq2txq(vq);
>  
>  	sq = &vi->sq[i];
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0





[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux