Re: [PATCH 1/4] vdpa/octeon_ep: enable support for multiple interrupts per device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:34:50PM +0530, Shijith Thotton wrote:
> @@ -63,44 +80,53 @@ static irqreturn_t octep_vdpa_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
>  static void octep_free_irqs(struct octep_hw *oct_hw)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = oct_hw->pdev;
> +	int irq;
> +
> +	for (irq = 0; irq < oct_hw->nb_irqs && oct_hw->irqs; irq++) {
> +		if (oct_hw->irqs[irq] < 0)
> +			continue;
>  
> -	if (oct_hw->irq != -1) {
> -		devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, oct_hw->irq, oct_hw);
> -		oct_hw->irq = -1;
> +		devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, oct_hw->irqs[irq], oct_hw);
>  	}
> +
>  	pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> +	kfree(oct_hw->irqs);

You should add:

	oct_hw->nb_irqs = 0;
	oct_hw->irqs = NULL;

Otherwise if reset is called twice in a row, before re-initializing the IRQs it
results in a use after free.

>  }
>  
>  static int octep_request_irqs(struct octep_hw *oct_hw)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = oct_hw->pdev;
> -	int ret, irq;
> +	int ret, irq, idx;
>  
> -	/* Currently HW device provisions one IRQ per VF, hence
> -	 * allocate one IRQ for all virtqueues call interface.
> -	 */
> -	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> +	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, oct_hw->nb_irqs, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to alloc msix vector");
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	snprintf(oct_hw->vqs->msix_name, sizeof(oct_hw->vqs->msix_name),
> -		 OCTEP_VDPA_DRIVER_NAME "-vf-%d", pci_iov_vf_id(pdev));
> +	oct_hw->irqs = kcalloc(oct_hw->nb_irqs, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);

This isn't free on the ->release() path or whatever.  octep_free_irqs() is
called on reset() but we rely on devm_ to free the IRQs on ->release().  Use
devm_kcalloc() here as well, probably.

> +	if (!oct_hw->irqs) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto free_irqs;
> +	}
>  
> -	irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0);
> -	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, octep_vdpa_intr_handler, 0,
> -			       oct_hw->vqs->msix_name, oct_hw);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register interrupt handler\n");
> -		goto free_irq_vec;
> +	memset(oct_hw->irqs, -1, sizeof(oct_hw->irqs));

This works, but it would be more normal to just leave it zeroed and check for
zero instead of checking for negatives.  There is never a zero IRQ.  See my blog
for more details:
https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2023/08/07/writing-a-check-for-zero-irq-error-codes/

regards,
dan carpenter

> +
> +	for (idx = 0; idx < oct_hw->nb_irqs; idx++) {
> +		irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, idx);
> +		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, octep_vdpa_intr_handler, 0,
> +				       dev_name(&pdev->dev), oct_hw);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register interrupt handler\n");
> +			goto free_irqs;
> +		}
> +		oct_hw->irqs[idx] = irq;
>  	}
> -	oct_hw->irq = irq;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -free_irq_vec:
> -	pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> +free_irqs:
> +	octep_free_irqs(oct_hw);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  

regards,
dan carpenter




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux