Re: [PATCH v2] vhost/vsock: specify module version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:21:03PM GMT, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification for the vhost_vsock module.

It is useful because it allows userspace to check if vhost_vsock is there when it is
configured as a built-in.

This is what we have *without* this change and when vhost_vsock is configured
as a module and loaded:

$ ls -la /sys/module/vhost_vsock
total 0
drwxr-xr-x   5 root root    0 Sep 29 19:00 .
drwxr-xr-x 337 root root    0 Sep 29 18:59 ..
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4096 Sep 29 20:05 coresize
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root    0 Sep 29 20:05 holders
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4096 Sep 29 20:05 initsize
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4096 Sep 29 20:05 initstate
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root    0 Sep 29 20:05 notes
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4096 Sep 29 20:05 refcnt
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root    0 Sep 29 20:05 sections
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4096 Sep 29 20:05 srcversion
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4096 Sep 29 20:05 taint
--w-------   1 root root 4096 Sep 29 19:00 uevent

When vhost_vsock is configured as a built-in there is *no* /sys/module/vhost_vsock directory at all.
And this looks like an inconsistency.

With this change, when vhost_vsock is configured as a built-in we get:
$ ls -la /sys/module/vhost_vsock/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x   2 root root    0 Sep 26 15:59 .
drwxr-xr-x 100 root root    0 Sep 26 15:59 ..
--w-------   1 root root 4096 Sep 26 15:59 uevent
-r--r--r--   1 root root 4096 Sep 26 15:59 version

Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
index 802153e23073..287ea8e480b5 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
@@ -956,6 +956,7 @@ static void __exit vhost_vsock_exit(void)

module_init(vhost_vsock_init);
module_exit(vhost_vsock_exit);
+MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1");

I was looking at other commits to see how versioning is handled in order to make sense (e.g. using the same version of the kernel), and I saw many commits that are removing MODULE_VERSION because they say it doesn't make sense in in-tree modules.

In particular the interesting thing is from nfp, where `MODULE_VERSION(UTS_RELEASE);` was added with this commit:

1a5e8e350005 ("nfp: populate MODULE_VERSION")

And then removed completely with this commit:

b4f37219813f ("net/nfp: Update driver to use global kernel version")

CCing Jakub since he was involved, so maybe he can give us some pointers.

Thanks,
Stefano

MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Asias He");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("vhost transport for vsock ");
--
2.34.1






[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux