Re: [PATCH v2] virtio: Add polling virtio-mmio device reset completion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 2:09 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 11:21:25AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 10:27 AM Jianguo Sun <quic_jianguos@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > We write 0 to device_status to initiate reset of a virtio-mmio device.
> > > The reset operation itself may or may not be completed by the time
> > > write instruction completes. Add polling device_status to return
> > > 0 to ensure reset completion before reinitializing the device.
> > >
> > > Change-Id: If15d11d090dfd0d4972ad35f49af03e076872413
> > > Signed-off-by: Jianguo Sun <quic_jianguos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sreenad Menon <quic_sreemeno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Anant Goel <quic_anantg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 6 ++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > index 90e784e7b721..cf1a4a3dd35d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
> > >  #include <uapi/linux/virtio_mmio.h>
> > >  #include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
> > > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > @@ -269,6 +270,11 @@ static void vm_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > >
> > >         /* 0 status means a reset. */
> > >         writel(0, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS);
> > > +       /* After writing 0 to device_status, the driver MUST wait for a read of
> > > +        * device_status to return 0 before reinitializing the device.
> > > +        */
> >
> > Is this copied from the spec? I can only see a similar description in
> > the PCI but not MMIO part.
>
> Not in spec. We can add something like this in spec, but it
> can not be a MUST, has to be a SHOULD.
>
> > > +       while (readl(vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS))
> > > +               msleep(1);
> >
> > Again, we probably need a feature bit to unbreak existing MMIO devices?
> >
> > THanks
>
> We can do this unconditionally since legacy devices return 0
> immediately,

The problem is that we can't audit all legacy device implementations.
Current driver still works if a device doesn't reset status to 0.

> feature negotiation happens after reset, won't be useful
> here.

Right, as said in another thread, it could be mmio specific flag or version.

Thanks

>
>
> > >  }
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
>






[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux