Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_blk: implement init_hctx MQ operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 17/09/2024 17:09, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hi Max,

On 17.09.2024 00:06, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
On 12/09/2024 9:46, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Dear All,

On 08.08.2024 00:41, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
Set the driver data of the hardware context (hctx) to point directly to
the virtio block queue. This cleanup improves code readability and
reduces the number of dereferences in the fast path.

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
    drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 42
++++++++++++++++++++------------------
    1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
This patch landed in recent linux-next as commit 8d04556131c1
("virtio_blk: implement init_hctx MQ operation"). In my tests I found
that it introduces a regression in system suspend/resume operation. From
time to time system crashes during suspend/resume cycle. Reverting this
patch on top of next-20240911 fixes this problem.
Could you please provide a detailed explanation of the system
suspend/resume operation and the specific testing methodology employed?
In my tests I just call the 'rtcwake -s10 -mmem' command many times in a
loop. I use standard Debian image under QEMU/ARM64. Nothing really special.

I run this test on my bare metal x86 server in a loop with fio in the background.

The test passed.

Can you please re-test with the linux/master branch with applying this patch on top ?


The occurrence of a kernel panic from this commit is unexpected, given
that it primarily involves pointer reassignment without altering the
lifecycle of vblk/vqs.

In the virtqueue_add_split function, which pointer is becoming null
and causing the issue? A detailed analysis would be helpful.

The report indicates that the crash occurs sporadically rather than
consistently.

is it possible that this is a race condition introduced by a different
commit? How can we rule out this possibility?
This is the commit pointed by bisecting between v6.11-rc1 and
next-20240911. The problem is reproducible, it just need a few calls to
the rtcwake command.
Prior to applying this commit, what were the test results?
Specifically, out of 100 test runs, how many passed successfully?
All 100 were successful, see https://pastebin.com/3yETvXK9 (kernel is
compiled from 6d17035a7402, which is a parent of $subject in linux-next).

After applying this commit, what are the updated test results? Again,
out of 100 test runs, how many passed successfully?
Usually it freezes or panics after the second try, see
https://pastebin.com/u5n9K1Dz (kernel compiled from 8d04556131c1, which
is $subject in linux-next).

I've even managed to catch a kernel panic log of this problem on QEMU's
ARM64 'virt' machine:

root@target:~# time rtcwake -s10 -mmem
rtcwake: wakeup from "mem" using /dev/rtc0 at Thu Sep 12 07:11:52 2024
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0000000000000090
Mem abort info:
     ESR = 0x0000000096000046
     EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
     SET = 0, FnV = 0
     EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
     FSC = 0x06: level 2 translation fault
Data abort info:
     ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000046, ISS2 = 0x00000000
     CM = 0, WnR = 1, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
     GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000046bbb000
...
Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000046 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: bluetooth ecdh_generic ecc rfkill ipv6
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:0H Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6+ #9024
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_requeue_work
pstate: 800000c5 (Nzcv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : virtqueue_add_split+0x458/0x63c
lr : virtqueue_add_split+0x1d0/0x63c
...
Call trace:
    virtqueue_add_split+0x458/0x63c
    virtqueue_add_sgs+0xc4/0xec
    virtblk_add_req+0x8c/0xf4
    virtio_queue_rq+0x6c/0x1bc
    blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x21c/0x714
    __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xb4/0x58c
    blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x30/0x6c
    blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x14c/0x40c
    blk_mq_run_hw_queues+0x64/0x124
    blk_mq_requeue_work+0x188/0x1bc
    process_one_work+0x20c/0x608
    worker_thread+0x238/0x370
    kthread+0x124/0x128
    ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: f9404282 79401c21 b9004a81 f94047e1 (f8206841)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
note: kworker/0:0H[9] exited with irqs disabled
note: kworker/0:0H[9] exited with preempt_count 1


diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 2351f411fa46..35a7a586f6f5 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -129,14 +129,6 @@ static inline blk_status_t virtblk_result(u8
status)
        }
    }
    -static inline struct virtio_blk_vq *get_virtio_blk_vq(struct
blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
-{
-    struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
-    struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = &vblk->vqs[hctx->queue_num];
-
-    return vq;
-}
-
    static int virtblk_add_req(struct virtqueue *vq, struct
virtblk_req *vbr)
    {
        struct scatterlist out_hdr, in_hdr, *sgs[3];
@@ -377,8 +369,7 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
       static void virtio_commit_rqs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
    {
-    struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
-    struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = &vblk->vqs[hctx->queue_num];
+    struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = hctx->driver_data;
        bool kick;
           spin_lock_irq(&vq->lock);
@@ -428,10 +419,10 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct
blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
                   const struct blk_mq_queue_data *bd)
    {
        struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
+    struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = hctx->driver_data;
        struct request *req = bd->rq;
        struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
        unsigned long flags;
-    int qid = hctx->queue_num;
        bool notify = false;
        blk_status_t status;
        int err;
@@ -440,26 +431,26 @@ static blk_status_t virtio_queue_rq(struct
blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
        if (unlikely(status))
            return status;
    -    spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
-    err = virtblk_add_req(vblk->vqs[qid].vq, vbr);
+    spin_lock_irqsave(&vq->lock, flags);
+    err = virtblk_add_req(vq->vq, vbr);
        if (err) {
-        virtqueue_kick(vblk->vqs[qid].vq);
+        virtqueue_kick(vq->vq);
            /* Don't stop the queue if -ENOMEM: we may have failed to
             * bounce the buffer due to global resource outage.
             */
            if (err == -ENOSPC)
                blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(hctx);
-        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
+        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vq->lock, flags);
            virtblk_unmap_data(req, vbr);
            return virtblk_fail_to_queue(req, err);
        }
    -    if (bd->last && virtqueue_kick_prepare(vblk->vqs[qid].vq))
+    if (bd->last && virtqueue_kick_prepare(vq->vq))
            notify = true;
-    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vqs[qid].lock, flags);
+    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vq->lock, flags);
           if (notify)
-        virtqueue_notify(vblk->vqs[qid].vq);
+        virtqueue_notify(vq->vq);
        return BLK_STS_OK;
    }
    @@ -504,7 +495,7 @@ static void virtio_queue_rqs(struct request
**rqlist)
        struct request *requeue_list = NULL;
           rq_list_for_each_safe(rqlist, req, next) {
-        struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = get_virtio_blk_vq(req->mq_hctx);
+        struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
            bool kick;
               if (!virtblk_prep_rq_batch(req)) {
@@ -1164,6 +1155,16 @@ static const struct attribute_group
*virtblk_attr_groups[] = {
        NULL,
    };
    +static int virtblk_init_hctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, void
*data,
+        unsigned int hctx_idx)
+{
+    struct virtio_blk *vblk = data;
+    struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = &vblk->vqs[hctx_idx];
+
+    hctx->driver_data = vq;
+    return 0;
+}
+
    static void virtblk_map_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
    {
        struct virtio_blk *vblk = set->driver_data;
@@ -1205,7 +1206,7 @@ static void virtblk_complete_batch(struct
io_comp_batch *iob)
    static int virtblk_poll(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct
io_comp_batch *iob)
    {
        struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
-    struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = get_virtio_blk_vq(hctx);
+    struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = hctx->driver_data;
        struct virtblk_req *vbr;
        unsigned long flags;
        unsigned int len;
@@ -1236,6 +1237,7 @@ static const struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = {
        .queue_rqs    = virtio_queue_rqs,
        .commit_rqs    = virtio_commit_rqs,
        .complete    = virtblk_request_done,
+    .init_hctx    = virtblk_init_hctx,
        .map_queues    = virtblk_map_queues,
        .poll        = virtblk_poll,
    };
Best regards
Best regards




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux