Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] virtio_net: Fix mismatched buf address when unmapping for small packets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:32:45 +0800, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:13:51 +0800, Wenbo Li <liwenbo.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Currently, the virtio-net driver will perform a pre-dma-mapping for
> > small or mergeable RX buffer. But for small packets, a mismatched address
> > without VIRTNET_RX_PAD and xdp_headroom is used for unmapping.
> >
> > That will result in unsynchronized buffers when SWIOTLB is enabled, for
> > example, when running as a TDX guest.
> >
> > This patch unifies the address passed to the virtio core as the address of
> > the virtnet header and fixes the mismatched buffer address.
> >
> > Changes from v2: unify the buf that passed to the virtio core in small
> > and merge mode.
> > Changes from v1: Use ctx to get xdp_headroom.
> >
> > Fixes: 295525e29a5b ("virtio_net: merge dma operations when filling mergeable buffers")
> > Signed-off-by: Wenbo Li <liwenbo.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiahui Cen <cenjiahui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ying Fang <fangying.tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

For net/virtio maintainers:

Because the premapped mode is closed by default for virtio-net rx. So this bug
will not be triggered. DO NOT worry about it.

So that is ok if we merge it into next version. (The merge window is closed).

Thanks.



>
> Thanks.
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 ++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 6f4781ec2b36..f8131f92a392 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -1807,6 +1807,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct net_device *dev,
> >  	struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
> >  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> >
> > +	/* We passed the address of virtnet header to virtio-core,
> > +	 * so truncate the padding.
> > +	 */
> > +	buf -= VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom;
> > +
> >  	len -= vi->hdr_len;
> >  	u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes, len);
> >
> > @@ -2422,8 +2427,9 @@ static int add_recvbuf_small(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> >  	if (unlikely(!buf))
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -	virtnet_rq_init_one_sg(rq, buf + VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom,
> > -			       vi->hdr_len + GOOD_PACKET_LEN);
> > +	buf += VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom;
> > +
> > +	virtnet_rq_init_one_sg(rq, buf, vi->hdr_len + GOOD_PACKET_LEN);
> >
> >  	err = virtqueue_add_inbuf_ctx(rq->vq, rq->sg, 1, buf, ctx, gfp);
> >  	if (err < 0) {
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux