Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 0/7]vhost: Add support of kthread API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/10/24 10:45 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> It depends on how we define "secure". There's plenty of users of
>>> kthread and if I was not wrong, mike may still need to fix some bugs.
>>>
>>
>> which bugs?
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/06369c2c-c363-4def-9ce0-f018a9e10e8d@xxxxxxxxxx/T/

The SIGKILL issue in that specific email is fixed. The patches are
merged upstream. I don't know of any other bugs like that (crashes,
hangs, etc). There is the one we can't reproduce so are not sure if
it's the vhost changes.

There is the change in behavior type of bug we discussed in that
thread:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/06369c2c-c363-4def-9ce0-f018a9e10e8d@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m026f7dd96e064e3a604155e45e7ae9d5c949ae23




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux