Re: clearly mark DMA_OPS support as an architecture feasture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 2:30 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 02:27:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Actually I meant, we can extend the virtio_config_ops to allow mapping
> > ops there, then simulator and VDUSE can hook the map ops there.
>
> From a quick glance that feels like the right layer of abstraction,
> although the config part of the name feels wrong at that point.

Right, or we could have a dedicated map_ops instead of trying to use
virtio_config_ops.

Thanks

>






[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux