Re: [PATCH 8/9] vdap: solidrun: Replace deprecated PCI functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 19/08/2024 à 18:51, Philipp Stanner a écrit :
solidrun utilizes pcim_iomap_regions(), which has been deprecated by the
PCI subsystem in commit e354bb84a4c1 ("PCI: Deprecate
pcim_iomap_table(), pcim_iomap_regions_request_all()"), among other
things because it forces usage of quite a complicated bitmask mechanism.
The bitmask handling code can entirely be removed by replacing
pcim_iomap_regions() and pcim_iomap_table().

Replace pcim_iomap_regions() and pcim_iomap_table() with
pci_iomap_region().

Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c | 47 +++++++++++--------------------
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c
index 99428a04068d..abf027ca35e1 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/solidrun/snet_main.c
@@ -556,33 +556,24 @@ static const struct vdpa_config_ops snet_config_ops = {
  static int psnet_open_pf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct psnet *psnet)
  {
  	char name[50];
-	int ret, i, mask = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "psnet[%s]-bars", pci_name(pdev));
+
  	/* We don't know which BAR will be used to communicate..
  	 * We will map every bar with len > 0.
  	 *
  	 * Later, we will discover the BAR and unmap all other BARs.
  	 */
  	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
-		if (pci_resource_len(pdev, i))
-			mask |= (1 << i);
-	}
-
-	/* No BAR can be used.. */
-	if (!mask) {
-		SNET_ERR(pdev, "Failed to find a PCI BAR\n");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "psnet[%s]-bars", pci_name(pdev));
-	ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, mask, name);
-	if (ret) {
-		SNET_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request and map PCI BARs\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
+		if (pci_resource_len(pdev, i)) {
+			psnet->bars[i] = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, i, name);

Hi,

Unrelated to the patch, but is is safe to have 'name' be on the stack?

pcim_iomap_region()
--> __pcim_request_region()
--> __pcim_request_region_range()
--> request_region() or __request_mem_region()
--> __request_region()
--> __request_region_locked()
--> res->name = name;

So an address on the stack ends in the 'name' field of a "struct resource".

According to a few grep, it looks really unusual.

I don't know if it is used, but it looks strange to me.


If it is an issue, it was apparently already there before this patch.

+			if (IS_ERR(psnet->bars[i])) {
+				SNET_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request and map PCI BARs\n");
+				return PTR_ERR(psnet->bars[i]);
+			}
+		}
- for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
-		if (mask & (1 << i))
-			psnet->bars[i] = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[i];
  	}
return 0;
@@ -591,18 +582,15 @@ static int psnet_open_pf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct psnet *psnet)
  static int snet_open_vf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct snet *snet)
  {
  	char name[50];
-	int ret;
snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "snet[%s]-bar", pci_name(pdev));
  	/* Request and map BAR */
-	ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, BIT(snet->psnet->cfg.vf_bar), name);
-	if (ret) {
+	snet->bar = pcim_iomap_region(pdev, snet->psnet->cfg.vf_bar, name);

Same

Just my 2c.

CJ

+	if (IS_ERR(snet->bar)) {
  		SNET_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request and map PCI BAR for a VF\n");
-		return ret;
+		return PTR_ERR(snet->bar);
  	}
- snet->bar = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[snet->psnet->cfg.vf_bar];
-
  	return 0;
  }
@@ -650,15 +638,12 @@ static int psnet_detect_bar(struct psnet *psnet, u32 off) static void psnet_unmap_unused_bars(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct psnet *psnet)
  {
-	int i, mask = 0;
+	int i;
for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
  		if (psnet->bars[i] && i != psnet->barno)
-			mask |= (1 << i);
+			pcim_iounmap_region(pdev, i);
  	}
-
-	if (mask)
-		pcim_iounmap_regions(pdev, mask);
  }
/* Read SNET config from PCI BAR */





[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux