On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 2:04 AM Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08.08.24 10:20, Jason Wang wrote:
> > We used to call irq_bypass_unregister_producer() in
> > vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq() which is problematic as we don't know if the
> > token pointer is still valid or not.
> >
> > Actually, we use the eventfd_ctx as the token so the life cycle of the
> > token should be bound to the VHOST_SET_VRING_CALL instead of
> > vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq() which could be called by set_status().
> >
> > Fixing this by setting up irq bypass producer's token when handling
> > VHOST_SET_VRING_CALL and un-registering the producer before calling
> > vhost_vring_ioctl() to prevent a possible use after free as eventfd
> > could have been released in vhost_vring_ioctl().
> >
> > Fixes: 2cf1ba9a4d15 ("vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa")
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Note for Dragos: Please check whether this fixes your issue. I
> > slightly test it with vp_vdpa in L2.
> > ---
> > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > index e31ec9ebc4ce..388226a48bcc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > @@ -209,11 +209,9 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
> > if (irq < 0)
> > return;
> >
> > - irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> > if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx)
> > return;
> >
> > - vq->call_ctx.producer.token = vq->call_ctx.ctx;
> > vq->call_ctx.producer.irq = irq;
> > ret = irq_bypass_register_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> > if (unlikely(ret))
> > @@ -709,6 +707,12 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned int cmd,
> > vq->last_avail_idx = vq_state.split.avail_index;
> > }
> > break;
> > + case VHOST_SET_VRING_CALL:
> > + if (vq->call_ctx.ctx) {
> > + vhost_vdpa_unsetup_vq_irq(v, idx);
> > + vq->call_ctx.producer.token = NULL;
> > + }
> > + break;
> > }
> >
> > r = vhost_vring_ioctl(&v->vdev, cmd, argp);
> > @@ -747,13 +751,14 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned int cmd,
> > cb.callback = vhost_vdpa_virtqueue_cb;
> > cb.private = vq;
> > cb.trigger = vq->call_ctx.ctx;
> > + vq->call_ctx.producer.token = vq->call_ctx.ctx;
> > + vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(v, idx);
> > } else {
> > cb.callback = NULL;
> > cb.private = NULL;
> > cb.trigger = NULL;
> > }
> > ops->set_vq_cb(vdpa, idx, &cb);
> > - vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(v, idx);
> > break;
> >
> > case VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM:
> > @@ -1419,6 +1424,7 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> > for (i = 0; i < nvqs; i++) {
> > vqs[i] = &v->vqs[i];
> > vqs[i]->handle_kick = handle_vq_kick;
> > + vqs[i]->call_ctx.ctx = NULL;
> > }
> > vhost_dev_init(dev, vqs, nvqs, 0, 0, 0, false,
> > vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg);
>
> No more crashes, but now getting a lot of:
> vhost-vdpa-X: vq Y, irq bypass producer (token 00000000a66e28ab) registration fails, ret = -16
>
> ... seems like the irq_bypass_unregister_producer() that was removed
> might still be needed somewhere?
Probably, but I didn't see this when testing vp_vdpa.
When did you meet those warnings? Is it during the boot or migration?
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Dragos
>
>
