On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 08:25:23PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:14:43 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 08:07:17PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> > > >From the virtio spec:
> > >
> > > The driver MUST have negotiated the VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL
> > > feature when issuing commands VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_SET
> > > and VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_NOTF_COAL_VQ_GET.
> > >
> > > The driver must not send vq notification coalescing commands if
> > > VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL is not negotiated. This limitation of course
> > > applies to vq resize.
> > >
> > > Fixes: f61fe5f081cf ("virtio-net: fix the vq coalescing setting for vq resize")
> > > Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Eugenio Pé rez <eperezma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v1->v2:
> > > - Rephrase the subject.
> > > - Put the feature check inside the virtnet_send_{r,t}x_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd().
> > >
> > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > index 0383a3e136d6..2b566d893ea3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > @@ -3658,6 +3658,9 @@ static int virtnet_send_rx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > > {
> > > int err;
> > >
> > > + if (!virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL))
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +
> > > err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, rxq2vq(queue),
> > > max_usecs, max_packets);
> > > if (err)
> > > @@ -3675,6 +3678,9 @@ static int virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > > {
> > > int err;
> > >
> > > + if (!virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL))
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +
> > > err = virtnet_send_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, txq2vq(queue),
> > > max_usecs, max_packets);
> > > if (err)
> > > @@ -3743,7 +3749,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
> > > err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
> > > vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
> > > vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
> > > - if (err)
> > > + if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > >
> >
> >
> > So far so good.
> >
> > > @@ -3758,7 +3764,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
> > > vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs,
> > > vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets);
> > > mutex_unlock(&vi->rq[i].dim_lock);
> > > - if (err)
> > > + if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > > }
> >
> > I don't get this one. If resize is not supported,
>
> Here means that the *dim feature* is not supported, not the *resize* feature.
>
> > we pretend it was successful? Why?
>
> During a resize, if the dim feature is not supported, the driver does not
> need to try to recover any coalescing values, since the device does not have
> these parameters.
> Therefore, the resize should continue without interruption.
>
> Thanks.
you mean it's a separate bugfix?
> >
> > > --
> > > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> >
