Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] vpda: try to fix the potential crash due to misusing __GFP_NOFAIL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 2:05 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 3:42 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:00 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 6:08 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu 25-07-24 10:50:45, Barry Song wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 12:27 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed 24-07-24 20:55:40, Barry Song wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> > > > > > > index 791d38d6284c..eff700e5f7a2 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> > > > > > > @@ -287,28 +287,44 @@ void vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain)
> > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > >       struct vduse_bounce_map *map;
> > > > > > >       unsigned long i, count;
> > > > > > > +     struct page **pages = NULL;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >       write_lock(&domain->bounce_lock);
> > > > > > >       if (!domain->user_bounce_pages)
> > > > > > >               goto out;
> > > > > > > -
> > > > > > >       count = domain->bounce_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > > > > +     write_unlock(&domain->bounce_lock);
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +     pages = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*pages), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> > > > > > > +     for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> > > > > > > +             pages[i] = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AFAICS vduse_domain_release calls this function with
> > > > > > spin_lock(&domain->iotlb_lock) so dropping &domain->bounce_lock is not
> > > > > > sufficient.
> > > > >
> > > > > yes. this is true:
> > > > >
> > > > > static int vduse_domain_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > > > > {
> > > > >         struct vduse_iova_domain *domain = file->private_data;
> > > > >
> > > > >         spin_lock(&domain->iotlb_lock);
> > > > >         vduse_iotlb_del_range(domain, 0, ULLONG_MAX);
> > > > >         vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(domain);
> > > > >         vduse_domain_free_kernel_bounce_pages(domain);
> > > > >         spin_unlock(&domain->iotlb_lock);
> > > > >         put_iova_domain(&domain->stream_iovad);
> > > > >         put_iova_domain(&domain->consistent_iovad);
> > > > >         vhost_iotlb_free(domain->iotlb);
> > > > >         vfree(domain->bounce_maps);
> > > > >         kfree(domain);
> > > > >
> > > > >         return 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > This is quite a pain. I admit I don't have knowledge of this driver, and I don't
> > > > > think it's safe to release two locks and then reacquire them. The situation is
> > > > > rather complex. Therefore, I would prefer if the VDPA maintainers could
> > > > > take the lead in implementing a proper fix.
> > > >
> > > > Would it be possible to move all that work to a deferred context?
> > >
> > > My understanding is that we need to be aware of both the iotlb_lock and
> > > bounce_lock to implement the correct changes. As long as we still need
> > > to acquire these two locks in a deferred context, there doesn't seem to
> > > be any difference.
> > >
> > > I can do the memory pre-allocation before spin_lock(&domain->iotlb_lock),
> > > but I have no knowledge whether the "count" will change after I make
> > > the preallocation.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> > > b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> > > index 791d38d6284c..7ec87ef33d42 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> > > @@ -544,9 +544,12 @@ static int vduse_domain_release(struct inode
> > > *inode, struct file *file)
> > >  {
> > >         struct vduse_iova_domain *domain = file->private_data;
> > >
> > > +      struct page **pages;
> > > +      spin_lock(&domain->iotlb_lock); maybe also + bounce_lock?
> > > +      count = domain->bounce_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > +      spin_unlock(&domain->iotlb_lock);
> >
> > We probably don't need any lock here as bounce_size won't be changed .
> >
> > > +
> > > +       preallocate_count_pages(pages, count);
> > > +
> > > ....
> > >         spin_lock(&domain->iotlb_lock);
> > >         vduse_iotlb_del_range(domain, 0, ULLONG_MAX);
> > > -       vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(domain);
> > > +       vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(domain, pages);
> > >         vduse_domain_free_kernel_bounce_pages(domain);
> > >         spin_unlock(&domain->iotlb_lock);
> > >         put_iova_domain(&domain->stream_iovad);
> >
> > This seems to work.
>
> Thanks, Jason. I personally have no knowledge of vDPA. Could you please help
> review and test the patch below?
>
> From 1f3cae091159bfcaffdb4a999a4a8e37db2eacf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:55:40 +1200
> Subject: [PATCH RFC v2] vpda: try to fix the potential crash due to misusing
>  __GFP_NOFAIL
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> mm doesn't support non-blockable __GFP_NOFAIL allocation. Because
> __GFP_NOFAIL without direct reclamation may just result in a busy
> loop within non-sleepable contexts.
>
> static inline struct page *
> __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>                                                 struct alloc_context *ac)
> {
>         ...
>         /*
>          * Make sure that __GFP_NOFAIL request doesn't leak out and make sure
>          * we always retry
>          */
>         if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
>                 /*
>                  * All existing users of the __GFP_NOFAIL are blockable, so warn
>                  * of any new users that actually require GFP_NOWAIT
>                  */
>                 if (WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(!can_direct_reclaim, gfp_mask))
>                         goto fail;
>                 ...
>         }
>         ...
> fail:
>         warn_alloc(gfp_mask, ac->nodemask,
>                         "page allocation failure: order:%u", order);
> got_pg:
>         return page;
> }
>
> Let's move the memory allocation out of the atomic context and use
> the normal sleepable context to get pages.
>
> [RFC]: This has only been compile-tested; I'd prefer if the VDPA maintainers
> handles it.
>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.h |  3 ++-
>  drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c   | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> index 791d38d6284c..014809ac2b7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ int vduse_domain_add_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -void vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain)
> +void vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain, struct page **pages)
>  {
>         struct vduse_bounce_map *map;
>         unsigned long i, count;
> @@ -294,15 +294,16 @@ void vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain)
>
>         count = domain->bounce_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>         for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> -               struct page *page = NULL;
> +               struct page *page = pages[i];
>
>                 map = &domain->bounce_maps[i];
> -               if (WARN_ON(!map->bounce_page))
> +               if (WARN_ON(!map->bounce_page)) {
> +                       put_page(page);
>                         continue;
> +               }
>
>                 /* Copy user page to kernel page if it's in use */
>                 if (map->orig_phys != INVALID_PHYS_ADDR) {
> -                       page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>                         memcpy_from_page(page_address(page),
>                                          map->bounce_page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
>                 }
> @@ -543,10 +544,19 @@ static int vduse_domain_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  static int vduse_domain_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
>         struct vduse_iova_domain *domain = file->private_data;
> +       struct page **pages = NULL;
> +       unsigned long count, i;
> +
> +       if (domain->user_bounce_pages) {
> +               count = domain->bounce_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +               pages = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*pages), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> +               for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> +                       pages[i] = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> +       }
>
>         spin_lock(&domain->iotlb_lock);
>         vduse_iotlb_del_range(domain, 0, ULLONG_MAX);
> -       vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(domain);
> +       vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(domain, pages);
>         vduse_domain_free_kernel_bounce_pages(domain);
>         spin_unlock(&domain->iotlb_lock);
>         put_iova_domain(&domain->stream_iovad);
> @@ -554,6 +564,7 @@ static int vduse_domain_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>         vhost_iotlb_free(domain->iotlb);
>         vfree(domain->bounce_maps);
>         kfree(domain);
> +       kfree(pages);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.h b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.h
> index f92f22a7267d..db0b793d86db 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.h
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.h
> @@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ void vduse_domain_reset_bounce_map(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain);
>  int vduse_domain_add_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain,
>                                        struct page **pages, int count);
>
> -void vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain);
> +void vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain,
> +                                          struct page **pages);
>
>  void vduse_domain_destroy(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> index 7ae99691efdf..df7c1b6f1350 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c
> @@ -1030,6 +1030,8 @@ static int vduse_dev_queue_irq_work(struct vduse_dev *dev,
>  static int vduse_dev_dereg_umem(struct vduse_dev *dev,
>                                 u64 iova, u64 size)
>  {
> +       struct page **pages = NULL;
> +       unsigned long count, i;
>         int ret;
>
>         mutex_lock(&dev->mem_lock);
> @@ -1044,13 +1046,22 @@ static int vduse_dev_dereg_umem(struct vduse_dev *dev,
>         if (dev->umem->iova != iova || size != dev->domain->bounce_size)
>                 goto unlock;
>
> -       vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(dev->domain);
> +       if (dev->domain->user_bounce_pages) {
> +               count = dev->domain->bounce_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +               pages = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*pages),
> +                                     GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> +               for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> +                       pages[i] = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> +       }

Nit: there's some code duplication with vduse_domain_release().

Others look good to me.

Would you like to post a formal patch?

Thanks

> +
> +       vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(dev->domain, pages);
>         unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(dev->umem->pages,
>                                     dev->umem->npages, true);
>         atomic64_sub(dev->umem->npages, &dev->umem->mm->pinned_vm);
>         mmdrop(dev->umem->mm);
>         vfree(dev->umem->pages);
>         kfree(dev->umem);
> +       kfree(pages);
>         dev->umem = NULL;
>         ret = 0;
>  unlock:
> --
> 2.34.1
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > Michal Hocko
> > > > SUSE Labs
> > >
>
> Thanks
> Barry
>






[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux