Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 09:29:25AM CEST, mst@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 06:41:52AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: >> >> > From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 12:08 PM >> >> > I'm working on a fallback where admin queue and cvq would share config >> > vector. Lets see. >> >> Cvq or avq resulting in performing more MMIO reads of the config space is not good. >> CVQ and AVQ sharing irq is good, but it should not share with config change interrupt. > >Well if a hardware vendor doesn't want that, allocate enough vectors >and all is well. Your requirement is harder to implement because >ATM cvq isn't special from virtio core POV. Yeah, it's just a fallback. > >-- >MST >
