Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] bd4a633b6f: fsmark.files_per_sec -64.5% regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 10:35:37AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This is odd to say at least.  Any chance you can check the value
> of /sys/block/$DEVICE/queue/rotational for the relevant device before
> and after this commit?  And is this an ATA or NVMe SSD?
> 

Seems to be ATA SSD:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240624/202406241546.6bbd44a7-oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx/job.yaml

ssd_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSC2BG012T4_BTHC428201ZX1P2OGN-part1"

Most likely btrfs does something different depending on the nonrot flag
being set or not. (And like you are suggesting, most likely the value of
the nonrot flag is somehow different after commit bd4a633b6f)


Kind regards,
Niklas




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux