On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:08 PM Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Patch message suggestion:
Originally, the second loop initialized the CVQ. But (acde3929492b
("vdpa/mlx5: Use consistent RQT size") initialized all the queues in
the first loop, so the second iteration in ...
>
> The second iteration in init_mvqs() is never called because the first
> one will iterate up to max_vqs.
>
Either way,
Acked-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> index 1ad281cbc541..b4d9ef4f66c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> @@ -3519,12 +3519,6 @@ static void init_mvqs(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
> mvq->fwqp.fw = true;
> mvq->fw_state = MLX5_VIRTIO_NET_Q_OBJECT_NONE;
> }
> - for (; i < ndev->mvdev.max_vqs; i++) {
> - mvq = &ndev->vqs[i];
> - memset(mvq, 0, offsetof(struct mlx5_vdpa_virtqueue, ri));
> - mvq->index = i;
> - mvq->ndev = ndev;
> - }
> }
>
> struct mlx5_vdpa_mgmtdev {
>
> --
> 2.45.1
>
