Re: [PATCH v2] x86/paravirt: Disable virt spinlock on bare metal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On 2024-05-26 at 09:58:47 +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> The kernel can change spinlock behavior when running as a guest. But
> this guest-friendly behavior causes performance problems on bare metal.
> So there's a 'virt_spin_lock_key' static key to switch between the two
> modes.
> 
> The static key is always enabled by default (run in guest mode) and
> should be disabled for bare metal (and in some guests that want native
> behavior).
> 
> Performance drop is reported when running encode/decode workload and
> BenchSEE cache sub-workload.
> Bisect points to commit ce0a1b608bfc ("x86/paravirt: Silence unused
> native_pv_lock_init() function warning"). When CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
> is disabled the virt_spin_lock_key is incorrectly set to true on bare
> metal. The qspinlock degenerates to test-and-set spinlock, which
> decrease the performance on bare metal.
> 
> Fix this by disabling virt_spin_lock_key if it is on bare metal,
> regardless of CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS.
> 
> Fixes: ce0a1b608bfc ("x86/paravirt: Silence unused native_pv_lock_init() function warning")
> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Prem Nath Dey <prem.nath.dey@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Xiaoping Zhou <xiaoping.zhou@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>

A gentle ping on this patch :)

thanks,
Chenyu




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux