On Thu, 30 May 2024 18:55:17 -0700, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 31 May 2024 09:40:14 +0800 Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > On Thu, 30 May 2024 19:54:44 +0800, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 30 May 2024 07:53:17 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It's great that you are working on this but > > > > I'd like to see the actual use of this first. > > > > > > > > > For me, that is easy. But how should we do, if we use one patch set, > > > then the commit number maybe 26, that exceeds 15 (limit of the net next). > > > > Hi, Jakub > > > > There will be a huge patch set (about 25) to support AF-XDP for virtio-net. > > Can I just post this huge patch set if the maintainers of virtio-net agree? > > First of all, I see you posted v2 within 4 hours of v1, without really > waiting for Michael to reply. Because I was checking the code, I found some commits need to be prepared also. > So I guess that 15 patch rule is not the > only one you intend to break? Actually, that is the only one rule. > > On v1 Michael asked you to not do the rename, and start with AF_XDP > support. Why don't you do that instead of asking me if you can break > more rules? Because if I don't rename the files, there will still be about 21 commits. For me, I don't think this is the key. If I release everything in one patch set, then I think Michael can understand why I want to rename the files. Thanks. > -- > pw-bot: cr