Re: [PATCH net v2] virtio_net: fix missing lock protection on control_buf access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 30 May 2024 11:41:43 +0800, Heng Qi <hengqi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Refactored the handling of control_buf to be within the cvq_lock
> critical section, mitigating race conditions between reading device
> responses and new command submissions.
>
> Fixes: 6f45ab3e0409 ("virtio_net: Add a lock for the command VQ.")
> Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> v1->v2:
>   - Use the ok instead of ret.
>
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 4a802c0ea2cb..1ea8e6a24286 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -2686,6 +2686,7 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd
>  {
>  	struct scatterlist *sgs[5], hdr, stat;
>  	u32 out_num = 0, tmp, in_num = 0;
> +	bool ok;
>  	int ret;
>
>  	/* Caller should know better */
> @@ -2731,8 +2732,9 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd
>  	}
>
>  unlock:
> +	ok = vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
>  	mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock);
> -	return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
> +	return ok;
>  }
>
>  static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
> --
> 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux