Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: always initialize seqpacket_allow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:05 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There are two issues around seqpacket_allow:
> 1. seqpacket_allow is not initialized when socket is
>    created. Thus if features are never set, it will be
>    read uninitialized.
> 2. if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET is set and then cleared,
>    then seqpacket_allow will not be cleared appropriately
>    (existing apps I know about don't usually do this but
>     it's legal and there's no way to be sure no one relies
>     on this).
>
> To fix:
>         - initialize seqpacket_allow after allocation
>         - set it unconditionally in set_features
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+6c21aeb59d0e82eb2782@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reported-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: ced7b713711f ("vhost/vsock: support SEQPACKET for transport").
> Cc: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>

Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks






[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux