Re: [PATCH net-next v10 2/4] ethtool: provide customized dim profile management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:47:41 -0700, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 22:49:09 +0800 Heng Qi wrote:
> > >> +	nla_for_each_nested_type(nest, ETHTOOL_A_PROFILE_IRQ_MODERATION, nests, rem) {
> > >> +		ret = nla_parse_nested(moder,
> > >> +				       ARRAY_SIZE(coalesce_irq_moderation_policy) - 1,
> > >> +				       nest, coalesce_irq_moderation_policy,
> > >> +				       extack);
> > >> +		if (ret)
> > >> +			return ret;
> > >> +
> > >> +		if (!NL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(extack, nest, moder, ETHTOOL_A_IRQ_MODERATION_USEC)) {
> > >> +			if (irq_moder->coal_flags & DIM_COALESCE_USEC)  
> > > There are 3 options here, not 2:
> > >
> > > 	if (irq_moder->coal_flags & flag) {
> > > 		if (NL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK())
> > > 			val = nla_get_u32(...);
> > > 		else
> > > 			return -EINVAL;
> > > 	} else {
> > > 		if (moder[attr_type)) {
> > > 			BAD_ATTR()
> > > 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > 		}
> > > 	}  
> > 
> > Maybe we missed something.
> > 
> > As shown in the commit log, the user is allowed to modify only
> > a certain fields in irq-moderation. It is assumed that the driver
> > supports modification of usec and pkts, but the user may only
> > modify usec and only fill in the usec attr.
> > 
> > Therefore, the kernel only gets usec attr here. Of course, the user
> > may have passed in 5 groups of "n, n, n", which means that nothing
> > is modified, and rx_profile and irq_moderation attrs are all empty.
> 
> What you describe sounds good, but it's not what the code seems to be
> doing. NL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK() will set an error attribute if the attr is
> not present.

So here we can use:

+ if (moder[ETHTOOL_A_IRQ_MODERATION_USEC]) {
+ 	if (irq_moder->coal_flags & DIM_COALESCE_USEC)
+ 		new_profile[i].usec =
+ 			nla_get_u32(moder[ETHTOOL_A_IRQ_MODERATION_USEC]);
+ 	else
+ 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }

instead of:

+ if (!NL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(extack, nest, moder, ETHTOOL_A_IRQ_MODERATION_USEC)) {
+ 	if (irq_moder->coal_flags & DIM_COALESCE_USEC)
+ 		new_profile[i].usec =
+ 			nla_get_u32(moder[ETHTOOL_A_IRQ_MODERATION_USEC]);
+ 	else
+ 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }

to avoid missing information set in extack?

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux