Re: [PATCH io_uring-next/net-next v2 0/4] implement io_uring notification (ubuf_info) stacking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:08:38 +0100 you wrote:
> Please, don't take directly, conflicts with io_uring.
> 
> To have per request buffer notifications each zerocopy io_uring send
> request allocates a new ubuf_info. However, as an skb can carry only
> one uarg, it may force the stack to create many small skbs hurting
> performance in many ways.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [io_uring-next/net-next,v2,1/4] net: extend ubuf_info callback to ops structure
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7ab4f16f9e24
  - [io_uring-next/net-next,v2,2/4] net: add callback for setting a ubuf_info to skb
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/65bada80dec1
  - [io_uring-next/net-next,v2,3/4] io_uring/notif: simplify io_notif_flush()
    (no matching commit)
  - [io_uring-next/net-next,v2,4/4] io_uring/notif: implement notification stacking
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux