On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:15 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 4:45 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:08:10 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:38 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:24:53 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:04 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:56:45 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 4:50 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:43:24 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:35 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:49:12 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 1:39 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:47:55 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:51 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, we chain the pages of big mode by the page's private variable.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > But a subsequent patch aims to make the big mode to support
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > premapped mode. This requires additional space to store the dma addr.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Within the sub-struct that contains the 'private', there is no suitable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > variable for storing the DMA addr.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct { /* Page cache and anonymous pages */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /**
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * @lru: Pageout list, eg. active_list protected by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * lruvec->lru_lock. Sometimes used as a generic list
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * by the page owner.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > union {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct list_head lru;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Or, for the Unevictable "LRU list" slot */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Always even, to negate PageTail */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > void *__filler;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Count page's or folio's mlocks */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned int mlock_count;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Or, free page */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct list_head buddy_list;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct list_head pcp_list;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* See page-flags.h for PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct address_space *mapping;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > union {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > pgoff_t index; /* Our offset within mapping. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned long share; /* share count for fsdax */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /**
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * @private: Mapping-private opaque data.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Usually used for buffer_heads if PagePrivate.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Used for swp_entry_t if PageSwapCache.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Indicates order in the buddy system if PageBuddy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned long private;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > But within the page pool struct, we have a variable called
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dma_addr that is appropriate for storing dma addr.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > And that struct is used by netstack. That works to our advantage.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct { /* page_pool used by netstack */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /**
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * @pp_magic: magic value to avoid recycling non
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * page_pool allocated pages.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned long pp_magic;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct page_pool *pp;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned long _pp_mapping_pad;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned long dma_addr;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > atomic_long_t pp_ref_count;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other side, we should use variables from the same sub-struct.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So this patch replaces the "private" with "pp".
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of doing a customized version of page pool, can we simply
> > > > > > > > > > > > > switch to use page pool for big mode instead? Then we don't need to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > bother the dma stuffs.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The page pool needs to do the dma by the DMA APIs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > So we can not use the page pool directly.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I found this:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > define PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP BIT(0) /* Should page_pool do the DMA
> > > > > > > > > > > * map/unmap
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It seems to work here?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have studied the page pool mechanism and believe that we cannot use it
> > > > > > > > > > directly. We can make the page pool to bypass the DMA operations.
> > > > > > > > > > This allows us to handle DMA within virtio-net for pages allocated from the page
> > > > > > > > > > pool. Furthermore, we can utilize page pool helpers to associate the DMA address
> > > > > > > > > > to the page.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > However, the critical issue pertains to unmapping. Ideally, we want to return
> > > > > > > > > > the mapped pages to the page pool and reuse them. In doing so, we can omit the
> > > > > > > > > > unmapping and remapping steps.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Currently, there's a caveat: when the page pool cache is full, it disconnects
> > > > > > > > > > and releases the pages. When the pool hits its capacity, pages are relinquished
> > > > > > > > > > without a chance for unmapping.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Technically, when ptr_ring is full there could be a fallback, but then
> > > > > > > > > it requires expensive synchronization between producer and consumer.
> > > > > > > > > For virtio-net, it might not be a problem because add/get has been
> > > > > > > > > synchronized. (It might be relaxed in the future, actually we've
> > > > > > > > > already seen a requirement in the past for virito-blk).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The point is that the page will be released by page pool directly,
> > > > > > > > we will have no change to unmap that, if we work with page pool.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I mean if we have a fallback, there would be no need to release these
> > > > > > > pages but put them into a link list.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What fallback?
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1519607771-20613-1-git-send-email-mst@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If we put the pages to the link list, why we use the page pool?
> > > > >
> > > > > The size of the cache and ptr_ring needs to be fixed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Again, as explained above, it needs more benchmarks and looks like a
> > > > > separate topic.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If we were to unmap pages each time before
> > > > > > > > > > returning them to the pool, we would negate the benefits of bypassing the
> > > > > > > > > > mapping and unmapping process altogether.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes, but the problem in this approach is that it creates a corner
> > > > > > > > > exception where dma_addr is used outside the page pool.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > YES. This is a corner exception. We need to introduce this case to the page
> > > > > > > > pool.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So for introducing the page-pool to virtio-net(not only for big mode),
> > > > > > > > we may need to push the page-pool to support dma by drivers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Adding Jesper for some comments.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Back to this patch set, I think we should keep the virtio-net to manage
> > > > > > > > the pages.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What do you think?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I might be wrong, but I think if we need to either
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) seek a way to manage the pages by yourself but not touching page
> > > > > > > pool metadata (or Jesper is fine with this)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you mean working with page pool or not?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I meant if Jesper is fine with reusing page pool metadata like this patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > > If we manage the pages by self(no page pool), we do not care the metadata is for
> > > > > > page pool or not. We just use the space of pages like the "private".
> > > > >
> > > > > That's also fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2) optimize the unmap for page pool
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > or even
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3) just do dma_unmap before returning the page back to the page pool,
> > > > > > > we don't get all the benefits of page pool but we end up with simple
> > > > > > > codes (no fallback for premapping).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am ok for this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Right, we just need to make sure there's no performance regression,
> > > > > then it would be fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > I see for example mana did this as well.
> > > >
> > > > I think we should not use page pool directly now,
> > > > because the mana does not need a space to store the dma address.
> > > > We need to store the dma address for unmapping.
> > > >
> > > > If we use page pool without PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP, then store the dma address by
> > > > page.dma_addr, I think that is not safe.
> > >
> > > Jesper, could you comment on this?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I think the way of this patch set is fine.
> > >
> > > So it reuses page pool structure in the page structure for another use case.
> > >
> > > > We just use the
> > > > space of the page whatever it is page pool or not to store
> > > > the link and dma address.
> > >
> > > Probably because we've already "abused" page->private. I would leave
> > > it for other maintainers to decide.
> >
> > If we do not want to use the elements of the page directly,
> > the page pool is a good way.
> >
>
> Rethink this, I think that the approach of this series should be fine.
> It should be sufficient for virtio-net to guarantee that those pages
> are not used by the page pool.
>
> I will continue the review.
Btw, it would be better to describe those design considerations in the
changelog (e.g why we don't use page pool etc).
Thanks
>
> Thanks
