在 2024/3/22 下午1:17, Jason Wang 写道:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 7:46 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:When the dim worker is scheduled, if it fails to acquire the lock, dim may not be able to return to the working state later. For example, the following single queue scenario: 1. The dim worker of rxq0 is scheduled, and the dim status is changed to DIM_APPLY_NEW_PROFILE; 2. The ethtool command is holding rtnl lock; 3. Since the rtnl lock is already held, virtnet_rx_dim_work fails to acquire the lock and exits; Then, even if net_dim is invoked again, it cannot work because the state is not restored to DIM_START_MEASURE. Fixes: 6208799553a8 ("virtio-net: support rx netdim") Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index c22d111..0ebe322 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c @@ -3563,8 +3563,10 @@ static void virtnet_rx_dim_work(struct work_struct *work) struct dim_cq_moder update_moder; int i, qnum, err; - if (!rtnl_trylock()) + if (!rtnl_trylock()) { + schedule_work(&dim->work); return; + }Patch looks fine but I wonder if a delayed schedule is better.
The work in net_dim() core layer uses non-delayed-work, and the two cannot be mixed.
Thanks, Heng
Thanks/* Each rxq's work is queued by "net_dim()->schedule_work()" * in response to NAPI traffic changes. Note that dim->profile_ix -- 1.8.3.1
