Re: [PATCH] vp_vdpa: fix the method of calculating vectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:01 AM gavin.liu <gavin.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Yuxue Liu <yuxue.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When there is a ctlq and it doesn't require interrupt
> callbacks,the original method of calculating vectors
> wastes hardware MSI or MSI-X resources as well as system
> IRQ resources. Referencing the per_vq_vectors mode in the
> vp_find_vqs_msix function, calculate the required number
> of vectors based on whether the callback is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuxue Liu <yuxue.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> index 281287fae89f..5066970b2570 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,13 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
>         struct pci_dev *pdev = mdev->pci_dev;
>         int i, ret, irq;
>         int queues = vp_vdpa->queues;
> -       int vectors = queues + 1;
> +       int vectors = 0;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> +               if (vp_vdpa->vring[i].cb.callback != NULL)
> +                       vectors++;
> +       }
> +       vectors = vectors + 1;
>
>         ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, vectors, vectors, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
>         if (ret != vectors) {
> @@ -172,7 +178,7 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
>
>         vp_vdpa->vectors = vectors;
>
> -       for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> +       for (i = 0; i < vectors - 1; i++) {

This seems to be buggy. You didn't scan all queues so you will miss
the IRQ for the last queue.

Thanks

>                 snprintf(vp_vdpa->vring[i].msix_name, VP_VDPA_NAME_SIZE,
>                         "vp-vdpa[%s]-%d\n", pci_name(pdev), i);
>                 irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, i);
> @@ -191,7 +197,7 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
>
>         snprintf(vp_vdpa->msix_name, VP_VDPA_NAME_SIZE, "vp-vdpa[%s]-config\n",
>                  pci_name(pdev));
> -       irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, queues);
> +       irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vectors - 1);
>         ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, vp_vdpa_config_handler, 0,
>                                vp_vdpa->msix_name, vp_vdpa);
>         if (ret) {
> @@ -199,7 +205,7 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
>                         "vp_vdpa: fail to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
>                         goto err;
>         }
> -       vp_modern_config_vector(mdev, queues);
> +       vp_modern_config_vector(mdev, vectors - 1);
>         vp_vdpa->config_irq = irq;
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.43.0
>






[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux