On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 02:42:37PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:27:48 +0100, > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:06:43AM +0100, Aiswarya Cyriac wrote: > > > This commit fixes the following warning when building virtio_snd driver. > > > > > > " > > > *** CID 1583619: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) > > > sound/virtio/virtio_kctl.c:294 in virtsnd_kctl_tlv_op() > > > 288 > > > 289 break; > > > 290 } > > > 291 > > > 292 kfree(tlv); > > > 293 > > > vvv CID 1583619: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT) > > > vvv Using uninitialized value "rc". > > > 294 return rc; > > > 295 } > > > 296 > > > 297 /** > > > 298 * virtsnd_kctl_get_enum_items() - Query items for the ENUMERATED element type. > > > 299 * @snd: VirtIO sound device. > > > " > > > > > > This warning is caused by the absence of the "default" branch in the > > > switch-block, and is a false positive because the kernel calls > > > virtsnd_kctl_tlv_op() only with values for op_flag processed in > > > this block. > > > > > > Also, this commit unifies the cleanup path for all possible control > > > paths in the callback function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anton Yakovlev <anton.yakovlev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Aiswarya Cyriac <aiswarya.cyriac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1583619 ("Uninitialized variables") > > > Fixes: d6568e3de42d ("ALSA: virtio: add support for audio controls") > > > > > > > > > --- > > > sound/virtio/virtio_kctl.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/sound/virtio/virtio_kctl.c b/sound/virtio/virtio_kctl.c > > > index 0c6ac74aca1e..7aa79c05b464 100644 > > > --- a/sound/virtio/virtio_kctl.c > > > +++ b/sound/virtio/virtio_kctl.c > > > @@ -253,8 +253,8 @@ static int virtsnd_kctl_tlv_op(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int op_flag, > > > > > > tlv = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); > > > if (!tlv) { > > > - virtsnd_ctl_msg_unref(msg); > > > - return -ENOMEM; > > > + rc = -ENOMEM; > > > + goto on_msg_unref; > > > } > > > > > > sg_init_one(&sg, tlv, size); > > > @@ -281,14 +281,25 @@ static int virtsnd_kctl_tlv_op(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int op_flag, > > > hdr->hdr.code = > > > cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_SND_R_CTL_TLV_COMMAND); > > > > > > - if (copy_from_user(tlv, utlv, size)) > > > + if (copy_from_user(tlv, utlv, size)) { > > > rc = -EFAULT; > > > - else > > > + goto on_msg_unref; > > > + } else { > > > rc = virtsnd_ctl_msg_send(snd, msg, &sg, NULL, false); > > > + } > > > > > > break; > > > + default: > > > + rc = -EINVAL; > > > + /* We never get here - we listed all values for op_flag */ > > > + WARN_ON(1); > > > + goto on_msg_unref; > > > } > > > + kfree(tlv); > > > + return rc; > > > > > > +on_msg_unref: > > > + virtsnd_ctl_msg_unref(msg); > > > kfree(tlv); > > > > > > return rc; > > > > I don't really like adding code for a false-positive but ALSA > > maintainers seem to like this. If yes, this seems like as good > > a way as any to do it. > > Err, no, you misunderstood the situation. > > I took the v1 patch quickly because: > - It was with Anton's SOB, who is another maintainer of the driver > - I assumed you lost interest in this driver since you haven't reacted > to the previous patches for long time > - The change there was small and simple enough > > Now, it grows unnecessarily large, and yet you complained. Why should > I take it, then? > > This is a subtle cosmetic issue that isn't worth for wasting too much > time and energy. If we want to shut up the compile warning, and this > is a case where it can't happen, just put the "default:" to the > existing case. If you want to be user-friendly, put some comment. > That's all. It'll be a one-liner. > > OTOH, if we do care and want to catch any potential logical mistake, > you can put WARN(). But, this doesn't have to go out as an error. > Simply putting WARN() for the default and going through would work, > too. > > Or we can keep this lengthy changes if we want, too. > > So, I really don't mind which way to fix as long as it works correctly > (and doesn't look too ugly). Please make agreement among you guys, > and resubmit if needed. > > > thanks, > > Takashi OK sorry about too verbose. I mean since Anton wants it, I ack this. Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> -- MST