> On Dec 27, 2023, at 18:06, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 03:26:30PM +0800, Li Feng wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 26, 2023, at 23:38, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 05:01:40PM +0800, Li Feng wrote: >>>> I don't have ideas right now to answer Christoph/Paolo's question. >>> >>> Paolo did some testing on this thread and posted some concerns. >>> Do you disagree with his analysis? >> >> Paolo gave a very detailed data analysis. Indeed, in some low queue depth >> scenarios, the data dropped somewhat. However, I suspect that it may be >> caused by other problems (such as test fluctuations) rather than the benefits >> brought by deadline. > > Maybe. I think it would be up to you to prove this then. Ok. > > >> BTW, I think 128 queue depth test is a very important and common performance >> test item for storage devices. >> >> Thanks, >> Li >> >>> >>> -- >>> MST >>> >
