Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_dma()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 4:04 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> introduce virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_dma() to collect the dma info when
> get buf from virtio core for premapped mode.
>
> If the virtio queue is premapped mode, the virtio-net send buf may
> have many desc. Every desc dma address need to be unmap. So here we
> introduce a new helper to collect the dma address of the buffer from
> the virtio core.
>
> Because the BAD_RING is called (that may set vq->broken), so
> the relative "const" of vq is removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good overall. Minor comments.

> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  include/linux/virtio.h       |  16 ++++
>  2 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 51d8f3299c10..3bcf3e6067af 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -362,6 +362,37 @@ static struct device *vring_dma_dev(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq)
>         return vq->dma_dev;
>  }
>
> +static bool get_dma_info(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> +                        struct virtio_dma_head *dma,
> +                        dma_addr_t addr, unsigned int length)

Rethink about the name, how about vring_need_unmap()?

> +{
> +       if (vq->do_unmap)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       /* Only premapped mode. we should return the dma info to driver.
> +        * If the use_dma_api is false, then do_unmap is false. But
> +        * we should not return the dma info to driver.
> +        */

It might be better to move this above this function? And we can
explain the return value there.

> +       if (!vq->premapped)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       if (!dma)
> +               return false;

It looks to me like it's better to check dma at the beginning.


> +
> +       if (unlikely(dma->next >= dma->num)) {
> +               BAD_RING(vq, "premapped vq: collect dma overflow: %pad %u\n",
> +                        &addr, length);
> +               return false;
> +       }
> +
> +       dma->items[dma->next].addr = addr;
> +       dma->items[dma->next].length = length;
> +
> +       ++dma->next;
> +
> +       return false;
> +}
> +
>  /* Map one sg entry. */
>  static int vring_map_one_sg(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq, struct scatterlist *sg,
>                             enum dma_data_direction direction, dma_addr_t *addr)
> @@ -440,12 +471,14 @@ static void virtqueue_init(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, u32 num)
>   * Split ring specific functions - *_split().
>   */
>
> -static void vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> -                                          const struct vring_desc *desc)
> +static void vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> +                                          const struct vring_desc *desc,
> +                                          struct virtio_dma_head *dma)
>  {
>         u16 flags;
>
> -       if (!vq->do_unmap)
> +       if (!get_dma_info(vq, dma, virtio64_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, desc->addr),
> +                         virtio32_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, desc->len)))
>                 return;
>
>         flags = virtio16_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, desc->flags);
> @@ -457,8 +490,8 @@ static void vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
>                        DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>  }
>
> -static unsigned int vring_unmap_one_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> -                                         unsigned int i)
> +static unsigned int vring_unmap_one_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> +                                         unsigned int i, struct virtio_dma_head *dma)
>  {
>         struct vring_desc_extra *extra = vq->split.desc_extra;
>         u16 flags;
> @@ -474,17 +507,16 @@ static unsigned int vring_unmap_one_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
>                                  extra[i].len,
>                                  (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
>                                  DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> -       } else {
> -               if (!vq->do_unmap)
> -                       goto out;
> -
> -               dma_unmap_page(vring_dma_dev(vq),
> -                              extra[i].addr,
> -                              extra[i].len,
> -                              (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
> -                              DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +               goto out;
>         }
>
> +       if (!get_dma_info(vq, dma, extra[i].addr, extra[i].len))
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       dma_unmap_page(vring_dma_dev(vq), extra[i].addr, extra[i].len,
> +                      (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
> +                      DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +
>  out:
>         return extra[i].next;
>  }
> @@ -717,10 +749,10 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
>                 if (i == err_idx)
>                         break;
>                 if (indirect) {
> -                       vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(vq, &desc[i]);
> +                       vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(vq, &desc[i], NULL);
>                         i = virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, desc[i].next);
>                 } else
> -                       i = vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i);
> +                       i = vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i, NULL);
>         }
>
>  free_indirect:
> @@ -763,11 +795,13 @@ static bool virtqueue_kick_prepare_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>  }
>
>  static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> -                            void **ctx)
> +                            struct virtio_dma_head *dma, void **ctx)
>  {
>         unsigned int i, j;
>         __virtio16 nextflag = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
>
> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(vq->premapped && !dma);

Let's add a comment here as well as the packed version.

Thanks






[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux