On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:43:16PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 12/4/23 15:55, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >> Okay, that means s/_locked/_nolock/ in drm_gem_shmem_helpers.{c,h}, I
> >> guess.
>
> DRM subsys and majority of kernel uses common _locked postfix. We should
> retain the old naming scheme by using _locked() in DRM. It's not
> worthwhile changing the name to a much less popular variant for a no
> good reason.
>
> Maxime, are you okay with keeping the _locked name?
Yeah... I still don't really like it, but you're right that it's best to
remain consistent over my opinion :)
Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
