Re: Re: EEVDF/vhost regression (bisected to 86bfbb7ce4f6 sched/fair: Add lag based placement)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:07:55PM +0800, Abel Wu wrote:
> On 11/17/23 8:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra Wrote:

[...]

> > Ah, so if this is a cgroup issue, it might be worth trying this patch
> > that we have in tip/sched/urgent.
> 
> And please also apply this fix:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231117080106.12890-1-s921975628@xxxxxxxxx/
> 

We applied both suggested patch options and ran the test again, so 

sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight
sched/fair: Update min_vruntime for reweight_entity() correctly

and

sched/eevdf: Delay dequeue

Unfortunately, both variants do NOT fix the problem.
The regression remains unchanged.


I will continue getting myself familiar with how cgroups are scheduled to dig 
deeper here. If there are any other ideas, I'd be happy to use them as a 
starting point for further analysis.

Would additional traces still be of interest? If so, I would be glad to
provide them.

[...]




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux