Re: [RFC] vdpa/mlx5: preserve CVQ vringh index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/27/2023 2:31 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:07 AM Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> mlx5_vdpa does not preserve userland's view of vring base for the control
>> queue in the following sequence:
>>
>> ioctl VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE
>> ioctl VHOST_VDPA_SET_STATUS VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK
>>   mlx5_vdpa_set_status()
>>     setup_cvq_vring()
>>       vringh_init_iotlb()
>>         vringh_init_kern()
>>           vrh->last_avail_idx = 0;
>> ioctl VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE
>>
>> To fix, restore the value of cvq->vring.last_avail_idx after calling
>> vringh_init_iotlb.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c |  7 ++++++-
>>  drivers/vhost/vringh.c            | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/vringh.h            |  2 ++
>>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>> index 946488b8989f..f64758143115 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>> @@ -2795,13 +2795,18 @@ static int setup_cvq_vring(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev)
>>         struct mlx5_control_vq *cvq = &mvdev->cvq;
>>         int err = 0;
>>
>> -       if (mvdev->actual_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ))
>> +       if (mvdev->actual_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ)) {
>> +               u16 last_avail_idx = cvq->vring.last_avail_idx;
>> +
>>                 err = vringh_init_iotlb(&cvq->vring, mvdev->actual_features,
>>                                         MLX5_CVQ_MAX_ENT, false,
>>                                         (struct vring_desc *)(uintptr_t)cvq->desc_addr,
>>                                         (struct vring_avail *)(uintptr_t)cvq->driver_addr,
>>                                         (struct vring_used *)(uintptr_t)cvq->device_addr);
>>
>> +               if (!err)
>> +                       vringh_set_base_iotlb(&cvq->vring, last_avail_idx);
> 
> Btw, vringh_set_base_iotlb() deserves an independent patch and it
> seems it is not specific to IOTLB, 

Agreed on both.  I initially submitted the smallest change needed to show the problem.

so we probably need an indirection
> to have vringh_set_base() first.

Not sure what you mean.  I have defined:

    static inline int __vringh_set_base() ...

    int vringh_set_base_iotlb()
        return __vringh_set_base(vrh, idx, putu16_iotlb);

to which I would add:

    int vringh_set_base_user()
        return __vringh_set_base(vrh, idx, putu16_user);

    int vringh_set_base_kern()
        return __vringh_set_base(vrh, idx, putu16_kern;

all in the same patch.

The call site in mlx5_vnet.c would be a 2nd patch.

- Steve

> Or I wonder if it's better to just introduce a new parameter to
> vringh_init_iotlb()...

I considered that, but IMO the parameter list there is already large, and it would
be strange to add a parameter for the initial value of avail, but not for used, and
no one needs the latter.

- Steve

>> +       }
>>         return err;
>>  }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>> index 7b8fd977f71c..799762c83007 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>> @@ -595,6 +595,24 @@ static inline void __vringh_notify_disable(struct vringh *vrh,
>>         }
>>  }
>>
>> +static inline int __vringh_set_base(struct vringh *vrh, u16 idx,
>> +                           int (*putu16)(const struct vringh *vrh,
>> +                               __virtio16 *p, u16 val))
>> +{
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    ret = putu16(vrh, &vrh->vring.avail->idx, idx);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    ret = putu16(vrh, &vrh->vring.used->idx, idx);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    vrh->last_avail_idx = vrh->last_used_idx = idx;
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /* Userspace access helpers: in this case, addresses are really userspace. */
>>  static inline int getu16_user(const struct vringh *vrh, u16 *val, const __virtio16 *p)
>>  {
>> @@ -1456,6 +1474,18 @@ void vringh_set_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_set_iotlb);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * vringh_set_base_iotlb - set avail_idx and used_idx
>> + * @vrh: the vring
>> + * @idx: the value to set
>> + */
>> +int vringh_set_base_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, u16 idx)
>> +{
>> +    return __vringh_set_base(vrh, idx, putu16_iotlb);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_set_base_iotlb);
>> +
>> +
>>  /**
>>   * vringh_getdesc_iotlb - get next available descriptor from ring with
>>   * IOTLB.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/vringh.h b/include/linux/vringh.h
>> index c3a8117dabe8..e9b8af4e6a5e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/vringh.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/vringh.h
>> @@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ int vringh_init_iotlb_va(struct vringh *vrh, u64 features,
>>                          struct vring_avail *avail,
>>                          struct vring_used *used);
>>
>> +int vringh_set_base_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, u16 idx);
>> +
>>  int vringh_getdesc_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh,
>>                          struct vringh_kiov *riov,
>>                          struct vringh_kiov *wiov,
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>
> 
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux