On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:01 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:01:54AM +0900, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> >KMSAN reported the following uninit-value access issue:
> >
> >=====================================================
> >BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1dfb/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1421
> > virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1dfb/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1421
> > vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
> > process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
> > process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
> > worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
> > kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
> > ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
> > ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
> >
> >Uninit was stored to memory at:
> > virtio_transport_space_update net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1274 [inline]
> > virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1ee8/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1415
> > vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
> > process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
> > process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
> > worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
> > kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
> > ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
> > ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
> >
> >Uninit was created at:
> > slab_post_alloc_hook+0x105/0xad0 mm/slab.h:767
> > slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline]
> > kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5a2/0xaf0 mm/slub.c:3523
> > kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:559
> > __alloc_skb+0x2fd/0x770 net/core/skbuff.c:650
> > alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1286 [inline]
> > virtio_vsock_alloc_skb include/linux/virtio_vsock.h:66 [inline]
> > virtio_transport_alloc_skb+0x90/0x11e0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:58
> > virtio_transport_reset_no_sock net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:957 [inline]
> > virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x1279/0x26a0 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:1387
> > vsock_loopback_work+0x3bb/0x5a0 net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c:120
> > process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2630 [inline]
> > process_scheduled_works+0xff6/0x1e60 kernel/workqueue.c:2703
> > worker_thread+0xeca/0x14d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
> > kthread+0x3cc/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:388
> > ret_from_fork+0x66/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
> > ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
> >
> >CPU: 1 PID: 10664 Comm: kworker/1:5 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-00146-g9f3ebbef746f #3
> >Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc38 04/01/2014
> >Workqueue: vsock-loopback vsock_loopback_work
> >=====================================================
> >
> >The following simple reproducer can cause the issue described above:
> >
> >int main(void)
> >{
> > int sock;
> > struct sockaddr_vm addr = {
> > .svm_family = AF_VSOCK,
> > .svm_cid = VMADDR_CID_ANY,
> > .svm_port = 1234,
> > };
> >
> > sock = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> > connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
> > return 0;
> >}
> >
> >This issue occurs because the `buf_alloc` and `fwd_cnt` fields of the
> >`struct virtio_vsock_hdr` are not initialized when a new skb is allocated
> >in `virtio_transport_alloc_skb()`. This patch resolves the issue by
> >initializing these fields during allocation.
> >
> >Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
>
> CCin Bobby, the original author, for any additional comments/checks.
>
> Yeah, I see, before that commit we used kzalloc() to allocate the
> header so we forgot to reset these 2 fields, and checking they are
> the only 2 missing.
>
> I was thinking of putting a memset(hdr, 0, sizeof(*hdr)) in
> virtio_vsock_alloc_skb() but I think it's just extra unnecessary work,
> since here we set all the fields (thanks to this fix), in vhost/vsock.c
> we copy all the header we receive from the guest and in
> virtio_transport.c we already set it all to 0 because we are
> preallocating the receive buffers.
>
> So I'm fine with this fix!
>
> >Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> >index 352d042b130b..102673bef189 100644
> >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> >@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
> > hdr->dst_port = cpu_to_le32(dst_port);
> > hdr->flags = cpu_to_le32(info->flags);
> > hdr->len = cpu_to_le32(len);
> >+ hdr->buf_alloc = cpu_to_le32(0);
> >+ hdr->fwd_cnt = cpu_to_le32(0);
> >
> > if (info->msg && len > 0) {
> > payload = skb_put(skb, len);
> >--
> >2.41.0
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
syzbot just reported the same [1], should we add the following tag?
Reported-by: syzbot+0c8ce1da0ac31abbadcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/00000000000008b2940608ae3ce9@xxxxxxxxxx/
Thanks,
Stefano
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
