On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 06:25:08PM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 04:53 PM +02, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> > Since commit 65c7cdedeb30 ("genirq: Provide new interfaces for affinity
> > hints") irq_set_affinity_hint is being phased out.
> >
> > Switch to new interfaces for setting and applying irq affinity hints.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Leave cpumask_copy as is. We can't pass pointer to stack memory as hint.
> > Proposed a change to IRQ affinity interface to address this limitation:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231025141517.375378-1-jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Just a note to the ^ - if we wanted to get rid of msix_affinity_masks,
> we could call irq_set_affinity directly, instead of calling it through
> irq_set_affinity[_and]_hint.
>
> The hint wouldn't be available any more in /proc/irq/N/affinity_hint,
> but the same information can be gathered from /proc/irq/N/smp_affinity.
>
> [...]
So we are potentially breaking some userspace - what's the value we
gain? Is there some way we can make disable_irq/enable_irq work?
That would have a lot of value.
There is an actual need for that in virtio for coco but we can't use
these APIs with affinity managed IRQs.
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
