On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 05:34:32 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 05:23:21PM +0800, Su Hui wrote: > > virtqueue_resize_packed() or virtqueue_resize_split() can return > > error code if failed, so add a check for this. > > > > Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > I'm not sure that return directly is right or not, > > maybe there are some process should do before return. > > yes - presizely what virtqueue_enable_after_reset does. > > Error handling in virtqueue_enable_after_reset is really weird BTW. > For some reason it overrides the error code returned. > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > index 51d8f3299c10..cf662c3a755b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > @@ -2759,6 +2759,9 @@ int virtqueue_resize(struct virtqueue *_vq, u32 num, > > else > > err = virtqueue_resize_split(_vq, num); > > > > + if (err) > > + return err; > > + > > return virtqueue_enable_after_reset(_vq); > > So I think it should be something like: > > int err_reset = virtqueue_enable_after_reset(_vq); > BUG_ON(err_reset); > > return err; > How about WARN and vq->broken? Thanks. > > > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_resize); > > -- > > 2.30.2 > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
