On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 7:17 AM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 0448700890f7..298634556fab 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -988,6 +988,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, /* a program that can execute syscalls */
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_NETFILTER,
> + BPF_PROG_TYPE_VNET_HASH,
Sorry, we do not add new stable program types anymore.
> @@ -6111,6 +6112,10 @@ struct __sk_buff {
> __u8 tstamp_type;
> __u32 :24; /* Padding, future use. */
> __u64 hwtstamp;
> +
> + __u32 vnet_hash_value;
> + __u16 vnet_hash_report;
> + __u16 vnet_rss_queue;
> };
we also do not add anything to uapi __sk_buff.
> +const struct bpf_verifier_ops vnet_hash_verifier_ops = {
> + .get_func_proto = sk_filter_func_proto,
> + .is_valid_access = sk_filter_is_valid_access,
> + .convert_ctx_access = bpf_convert_ctx_access,
> + .gen_ld_abs = bpf_gen_ld_abs,
> +};
and we don't do ctx rewrites like this either.
Please see how hid-bpf and cgroup rstat are hooking up bpf
in _unstable_ way.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
