On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:08:49AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:56:00AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > However - the Intel GPU VFIO driver is such a bad experiance I don't > > > want to encourage people to make VFIO drivers, or code that is only > > > used by VFIO drivers, that are not under drivers/vfio review. > > > > So if Alex feels it makes sense to add some virtio functionality > > to vfio and is happy to maintain or let you maintain the UAPI > > then why would I say no? But we never expected devices to have > > two drivers like this does, so just exposing device pointer > > and saying "use regular virtio APIs for the rest" does not > > cut it, the new APIs have to make sense > > so virtio drivers can develop normally without fear of stepping > > on the toes of this admin driver. > > Please work with Yishai to get something that make sense to you. He > can post a v2 with the accumulated comments addressed so far and then > go over what the API between the drivers is. > > Thanks, > Jason /me shrugs. I pretty much posted suggestions already. Should not be hard. Anything unclear - post on list. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
