In subject: "drm/virtio" to match previous history. On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:15:31PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Should be no functional change, just for cleanup purpose. > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c > index add075681e18..3a368304475a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c > @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int virtio_gpu_pci_quirk(struct drm_device *dev) > { > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev->dev); > const char *pname = dev_name(&pdev->dev); > - bool vga = (pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA; > + bool vga = pci_is_vga(pdev); This *is* a functional change: Previously "vga" was only true for PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA (0x0300). Now it will be true for both PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA (0x0300) and PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_OTHER (0x0380). Is that desirable? I can't tell. Maybe the GPU folks will chime in. > int ret; > > DRM_INFO("pci: %s detected at %s\n", > -- > 2.34.1 > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization